Of all the bullying landlords – and there are many – GreenSquareAccord (GSA) surely tops the disreputable list for going to the most vicious and extreme lengths in order to silence a resident for complaining about their services.
Meet Ben Jenkins (pictured above), GSA resident and SHAC member who had the temerity to challenge poor service by his landlord. The problem with Ben (from GSA’s perspective) is that he refused to blindly endure the hamster wheel of the internal complaints process. Instead, he went public not just on his own behalf, but for thousands of others just like him who are being let down by weak regulation and enforcement that allows housing associations to elude accountability.
GSA is a major landlord running around 26,000 properties, most of them on social housing tenancies. It was formed when two associations – GreenSquare and Accord – recently merged.
The chief executive of GreenSquare, Ruth Cooke, was elevated to lead the merged landlord, with an enlarged group of tenants and residents to let down. She features prominently in SHAC’s Golden Web article as one of the most well-networked and thus influential individuals in the housing association sector. It has been this rather than effective management that has kept her in a job.
The Start
Originally, Ben followed Government advice and wrote to his landlord outlining building safety problems, with evidence to back it up. He wrote to them again with more evidence when his first complaint was ignored. Ben didn’t give up on his complaint and his persistence eventually secured a meeting with chief executive Ruth Cooke. He received an apology and a promise of remedy. This should have been a satisfactory end to the story.
GSA however didn’t fix the problems, and eventually, Ben took his complaint to the Housing Ombudsman. This was more successful, and he won his case, with a compensation order for himself and his neighbours. Yet GSA continued to ignore the disrepairs and other issues.
Tenant and Resident Dissatisfaction Measured
There is a wealth of evidence on GSA’s need to improve. Social media posts by those at the sharp end of GSA’s customer care show that Ben and his neighbours are not alone. The posts describe phone calls, emails, and letters receiving no response, getting lost in the system, and being subjected to agonising delays, misunderstandings, and ineffective remedy.
A small sample of posts by GSA customers. Names redacted.
Even the regulatory establishment weighed in with its own unfavourable findings. In September 2023, the Housing Ombudsman Service found six counts of severe maladministration against GSA and launched a special investigation into their activities which is currently underway.
And if this isn’t evidence enough, there are GSA’s own Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSMs). The measures are compiled through an annual survey which is required by the Regulator of Social Housing. The results have to be made public so that all can judge the landlord’s performance.
GSA’s satisfaction measures range from poor to appalling. They hover around the 50% mark for satisfaction with the landlord overall, satisfaction with repairs and maintenance, satisfaction with the length of time it takes to complete repairs, and satisfaction with keeping communal areas clean and well-maintained. This is no ringing endorsement of GSA as a responsible social landlord.
The response to a question on whether tenant and resident views were listened to and acted upon were even more damning. Only 36% of respondents agreed that this was the case. Lowest of all were the proportion who were satisfied with GSA’s complaints handling. This score didn’t even reach 20%.
See GSA’s tenant satisfaction scores
In the retail sector, such poor levels of performance would have led to declining sales, an executive sacked with tarnished reputations, and the firm facing takeover by a more competent business. But despite the designation of housing associations as private companies, they do not have customers who can make the choice to go elsewhere. This differentiates them from businesses with genuine customers.
Housing association tenants and residents are a captive audience and their landlord has considerable influence over their physical and psychological health and life chances. And housing associations enjoy a uniquely privileged position where poor performance is rewarded with more government funding and closed rank support from the institutions that should be enforcing improvements.
GSA’s response to the overwhelming body of evidence against them was to focus their efforts on propaganda combined with quashing challenge. They were busy telling the world what a wonderful landlord they were, and couldn’t accept that anyone should be allowed to suggest otherwise.
Ultimately, Ben decided against banging his head on the customer service brick wall, concluding that the cause of the problem lay not with individual staff, but the fact that the designated role of ‘customer services’ was to wage a war of attrition which would deter all but the most determined or desperate complainant. It was a directory tasked with prevention not resolution. In the face of their intransigence, Ben launched a GSA residents website, and GSA responded by suing him.
The Agreement
GSA first demanded that Ben shut down his website and all social media channels, and refrain from setting up any new sites. Ben refused. GSA proceeded with legal action and the day before going to court, hand delivered a bill for over £9,000 for their legal costs. It was an entirely intimidatory act designed to cow Ben into submission. It didn’t work.
In court, GSA were berated by the judge for multiple failings and it was clear that they had no substantive case. Ben therefore offered a token set of undertakings to settle the case, for example making clear that his website was not an official GSA company page. He did not pay any of GSA’s costs and when the case was settled, believed that to be the end of the matter. It wasn’t.
GSA released a press statement disingenuously presenting the outcome as a success for them, but they really weren’t happy with the agreement they had signed. Almost immediately, they sued Ben again. This time they brought a criminal case, charging Ben with not adhering to provisions that weren’t actually in the agreement but that GSA felt that they “should have been”.
The second case was rightly dismissed, and their comments about what should have been in the agreement earned them the judge’s ridicule. This too should have been an end to the sorry saga, but GSA’s thirst for revenge seems to have driven reason and proportionality from their thinking.
Arrested But Undeterred
Steve Hayes, GSA’s Director of Corporate Affairs and Communications has now gone a step further and launched a personal attack on Ben. It is unclear if he is doing so with or without the backing of GSA. At half past one in the morning of the 19th August, six police officers knocked at Ben’s door and arrested him for allegedly harassing Steve. The charge is that Ben had sent emails to Steve despite having agreed not to, although Ben’s last correspondence with him was in November 2023.
Ben hosts the popular This is the GSA Way podcast
Ben is challenging the charges. He is undeterred and determined to call out their shoddy service, unsafe housing, and intimidation against those who complain. In doing so, he will continue to be supported by SHAC.
GSA is one of the worst landlords, but although its actions are extreme, they are not unique. This new government can and should break with these previously untouchable landlords and implement measures that will genuinely hold them to account. It is also surely time that GSA’s board members took control of the situation and ended the persecution of Ben that is damaging their reputation and galvanising opposition.
Our congratulations to Ben for surviving two rounds with the GSA Goliath, and coming out fighting. To provide support for Ben’s cause, please share our social media posts:
In His Own Words
Ben Jenkins runs the This is the GSA Way and Housing Sector websites and social media accounts. You can watch his podcast on the latest court action, here:
GSA Residents
Housing Sector
Ben Jenkins on LinkedIn
20 August 2024
If you have a WordPress account, get notifications about new articles by subscribing below:
Keep up the good work Ben, as you’re EXPOSING their harassment which they seem help bent on disgracing themselves with and will hopefully be prosecuted for harassment etc. We all know you’re not alone as many SHAC, housing association tenants ARE BEING HARASSED, I to have been taken to court by Guinness Homes for false claims of rent arrears, ASBO’s when it was G H who are antisocial, and Not Fit For Purpose, negligent, a danger to tenants etc. John Guinness Homes
You’re not the only one
It appears that everyday we are becoming more and more like a Banana Republic with the way the police are handling, and trying to suppress, legitimate freedom of speech on the whims of large housing associations without due diligence before they act.
We do not live as yet in Hong Kong, North Korea, South America, Venezuela or Nicaragua. We are not in a state of war, no national emergency has been declared in this country or marshal law. The behaviour of the authorities is reprehensible with no excuse to act in such a way against ordinary people like Ben who are trying to expose the facts. At 82 years old, I can remember my late father telling me the day war was declared on 3rd Sept 1939 that the prime minister at the time Chamberlain was declaring war on Germany at 11am and before he finished his speech two detectives appeared on the doorstep of a colleague to ask for his morse code set which he never received back until the war was over. This was understandable due to the circumstances then but the circumstances we have learned about today totally doesn’t justify the same level of deplorable action in the 1.30am arrest of Ben with six officers and three police cars for non-violent alleged harassment.
“We suffer, while housing associations prosper”
It appears that everyday we are becoming more and more like a Banana Republic with the way the police are handling, and trying to suppress, freedom of speech on the whims of large housing associations without due diligence before they act.
We do not live as yet in Hong Kong, North Korea, South America, Venezuela or Nicaragua. We are not in a state of war, no national emergency has been declared in this country or martial law. The behaviour of the authorities is reprehensible with no excuse to act in such a way against ordinary people like Ben who are trying to expose the facts. At 82 years old, I can remember my late father telling me the day war was declared on 3rd Sept 1939 that the prime minister at the time Chamberlain was declaring war on Germany at 11am and before he finished his speech two detectives appeared on the doorstep of a colleague to ask for his morse code set which he never received back until the war was over. This was understandable due to the circumstances then but the circumstances we have learned about today totally doesn’t justify the same level of deplorable action in the 1.30am arrest of Ben with six officers and three police cars for non-violent alleged harassment.
“We suffer, while housing associations prosper”
Ben has been a beacon of hope for victims of Housing Associations. Ben is the very model of a courteous gentleman whilst coolly exposing the shady, kafkaesque world of Housing Associations. The latest absurd turn of events is worthy of a dark comedy sketch. The joke’s not on Ben though; I look forward to hearing GSA’s intimidatory behavior exposed by the BBC and this incident being a catalyst for an Independent Inquiry into the extreme lengths that Housing Associations go to in censoring residents.
Shine on Ben; we are right behind you!
It’s a banana republic and I’m targetted too, Claire
SIX police officers???? What on earth did the bullying not-so-social-grossly-overpaid-better-than-public-sector-renumeration-package-poor-little-souls tell the police??????????
The fact an innocent Black British women of 60 plus, can be hounded and harassed for over 4 years, by a white male full of race hate – at her housing tenancy – with not one person doing anything about it, because the housing organisation themselves are using this race hate crime perpetrattor to illegally evict the black women for speaking up about access notice, building safety and service charges – says it all really.
Dont even get me started on hatred toward those on disability benefits, invisible disabilities